d
not been great.
58. and I protabl added, though I have a less distinct recollection of this that I thought the private practice of the Attorney Veneral was actrays combatible with his engagements to the brown - that data,
-
and interests sometimes cached
This Opinion I have frequenty expreend
M?
- it concerns Mr. Ansley as much as Me Bridges - for
in cases where
large fees have been paid to the Attoung General by one of the litigant, partics I have felt myself precluded from consulting him when such cases have
been befor
me on
final appeal.
59. But I could never have suspored
bo.
2334
that the confidence which usually exists between gentlemen in their private
interesira would be violated and
and my
words distorted, cxaggerated and
tolined in the muaimer
of
which Mur
Antly has given is extraordinan examile.
chim
an
Mr. Bridges spoke to me as to the charge thus brought against by Mr Austry, but I declined to take official cognizance of anything said before the Commission by my wither until all the proceedings
Aur
were betme
me but told M. Midges that his appointinent by me to his present
to be
ffice right to him that I had
a
-sufficient prosp to
Never
luid Offic
120
Official
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.